FT商学院

Rise of ESG renews debate over whether passive funds can deliver

Some analysts argue that active managers have much greater capacity to do good because they can sell their holdings

Passive providers will struggle to gain traction in some strategies focused on good environmental, social and governance (ESG) outcomes, because active managers have an edge in the area of stewardship, according to some analysts.

Despite record inflows into passive ESG products, some see challenges ahead as the demand for sustainable investment strategies shifts from avoiding harm to actively doing good.

So-called negative or exclusionary screening, which excludes certain companies, was the best-selling passive ESG strategy until 2018, according to Mark McFee, director at Broadridge Analytics Solutions.

您已阅读14%(608字),剩余86%(3716字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×