FT商学院

Rise of ESG renews debate over whether passive funds can deliver
ESG的兴起再次引发被动型基金的争论

Some analysts argue that active managers have much greater capacity to do good because they can sell their holdings
一些分析师认为,主动型基金经理做善事的能力要大得多,因为他们可以出售所持资产。

Passive providers will struggle to gain traction in some strategies focused on good environmental, social and governance (ESG) outcomes, because active managers have an edge in the area of stewardship, according to some analysts.

一些分析师认为,被动供应商将难以在一些专注于良好环境、社会和治理(ESG)结果的战略中获得吸引力,因为主动管理者在管理领域具有优势。

您已阅读5%(295字),剩余95%(5475字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×