观点Facebook

Time to turn off Facebook’s digital fire hose

How much control does the tech giant give users over ads? The answer, despite its protestations, seems to be hardly any

I got a call from my newly retired father recently, asking indignantly why ads for funeral homes and will-writing businesses were following him around the internet. He hadn’t been googling anything directly related, but had looked up some medications for my grandmother. I suggested that perhaps this, combined with his age, had caused some algorithm to conclude that he might require these services imminently. We tried to laugh it off, but I could tell the incident had unnerved him.

Many of us have our own algorithm war stories. Sometimes they’re relatively trivial. Sometimes downright cruel. Londoner Melissa Elliott, 38, lost her twins in 2019, four months into her pregnancy, but continued to receive maternity-related advertisements on Facebook for months after. She told the Huffington Post that she was driven to repeatedly google “miscarriage” in the hope it would nudge Facebook’s blinkered algorithm to stop the fire hose of baby ads.

Elliott’s attempt to appeal to the humanity of the algorithms, to connect the dots between miscarriages and mummy yoga, is particularly affecting. Because that simply isn’t how algorithms work.

您已阅读24%(1140字),剩余76%(3553字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×