专栏媒体

Is it time to shed our anonymity online?

Reading about the 19th century battles between Noah Webster and his many enemies, real and imagined, I was struck by the famed American lexicographer and others’ frequent resort to the anonymous article. In 1834, an article in a Massachusetts periodical accused Joseph Worcester, Webster’s mild-mannered rival, of “gross plagiarism”.

Webster’s name did not appear on the article, but it was in all likelihood written by him, according to The Dictionary Wars, a book by Peter Martin. Anonymous articles were common in the 18th century and much of the 19th.

In recent decades, anonymity in books, newspapers and established websites has been infrequent enough to create a sensation. Witness the fuss about Primary Colors, the 1996 novel about the Bill Clinton era. Originally published anonymously, it was eventually revealed to have been the work of the political columnist Joe Klein. Last year, the New York Times published an unsigned op-ed by a senior official in the Trump administration, who wrote that presidential appointees were “thwarting Mr Trump’s more misguided impulses”.

您已阅读25%(1081字),剩余75%(3270字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

斯卡平克

迈克尔•斯卡平克(Michael Skapinker)是英国《金融时报》副主编。他经常为FT撰写关于商业和社会的专栏文章。他出生于南非,在希腊开始了他的新闻职业生涯。1986年,他在伦敦加入了FT,担任过许多不同的职位,包括FT周末版主编、FT特别报道部主编和管理事务主编。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×