专栏能源业

Energy companies must act to avoid banks’ mistakes

A decade ago the phrase “level-three assets” made bankers wince. The reason? Back then it referred to an accounting category of securities so fiendishly hard to value with mark-to-market metrics that bankers were in effect allowed to create their own valuations.

No one cared about this oddity when times were good. But when the credit crisis exploded, investors realised that the valuations of those pesky level-three assets, which included products such as collateralised debt obligations, could vary wildly and could prove to be hopelessly wrong. So confidence crumbled — and with it the banks’ share prices.

Some of that opacity and anxiety has since been reduced at the US banks, at least in relation to items such as mortgage securities.

您已阅读16%(741字),剩余84%(3853字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉莲•邰蒂

吉莲•邰蒂(Gillian Tett)担任英国《金融时报》的助理主编,负责manbetx app苹果 金融市场的报导。2009年3月,她荣获英国出版业年度记者。她1993年加入FT,曾经被派往前苏联和欧洲地区工作。1997年,她担任FT东京分社社长。2003年,她回到伦敦,成为Lex专栏的副主编。邰蒂在剑桥大学获得社会人文学博士学位。她会讲法语、俄语、日语和波斯语。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×