The plaintiff is conflicted. The legal arguments appear tenuous. And, in places, the 35-page lawsuit that Elon Musk filed last week with the Superior Court of California against OpenAI reads like a mash-up between a science fiction film script and a letter from a jilted lover. But Musk’s submission that OpenAI has breached its founding charter and endangers humanity by prioritising profit over safety may still turn into the most substantial move yet to scrutinise the company’s attempts to develop artificial general intelligence.
原告内心矛盾。法律论据显得牵强。而且，埃隆•马斯克(Elon Musk)上周在加州高等法院(Superior Court of California)提起的针对OpenAI的35页起诉书的某些段落，看起来像是科幻电影剧本与被抛弃的情人的诉苦信的混合体。但马斯克的基本主张——OpenAI将利润置于安全之上，从而违反其创始章程，并危害人类——仍可能会成为监督该公司开发通用人工智能(AGI)尝试的迄今最为实质性的举措。
您已阅读12%（743字），剩余88%（5649字）包含更多重要信息，订阅以继续探索完整内容，并享受更多专属服务。