2023年度高峰论坛

There is more to AI regulation than safety

Recent debates about the technology also concern the kind of civilisation we want to create for ourselves

The writer is a barrister and the author of ‘The Digital Republic: Taking Back Control of Technology’

Last month’s boardroom carnage at OpenAI — in which the chief executive, Sam Altman, was toppled and reinstated in less than a week — showed the company to be riven by the same question that is set to dominate politics in 2024: to what extent should increasingly capable AI systems be curtained by government regulation?

This is ultimately a question for politicians rather than corporations. And the UK government has recently found its answer: safety first. The regulatory landmarks of 2023 were the Online Safety Act and the AI Safety Summit. “Safety” was the top priority for both. The act followed the suicide of 14-year-old Molly Russell, who had been served a torrent of online content related to self-harm. It aimed to make Britain “the safest place in the world to be online”. The summit got the regulatory ball rolling in a similar direction for AI. The Bletchley Declaration contained seven references to “safety”, and the UK’s AI Safety Institute is now actively recruiting.

您已阅读23%(1086字),剩余77%(3620字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×