观点SWIFT

Iran’s experience signals banning Swift will not work as expected

It was broad financial sanctions and fines, not cutting off access to the messaging network, that had the biggest impact.

Alistair Milne is a payments expert and professor at Loughborough University. Here he uses the example of the Iranian sanctions to show why banning Russian banks from Swift alone is not enough to shut Moscow out of international finance.

Since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine a curious narrative has taken hold: banning Russian banks from the Swift messaging system, a measure announced over this weekend, will somehow freeze the country out of the global financial system. The experience of financial sanctions on Iran suggests otherwise.

The US has applied, and periodically reinforced, economic sanctions on Iran for decades. From 1984 these sanctions largely targeted the Iranian oil industry. However, they were not made comprehensive until 2006, when a series of “targeted financial measures” were introduced to stop foreign banks undertaking financial transactions with Iran.

您已阅读17%(877字),剩余83%(4239字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×