专栏美国中东政策

America should drop the ‘Dr Evil fallacy’ on assassination

“Ladies and gentlemen, we got him”: I can still remember the exultant tone of Paul Bremer, the American governor of post-invasion Iraq, as he announced the capture of Saddam Hussein. Mr Bremer’s exhilaration was understandable. But it also pointed to a persistent fallacy that has undermined US foreign policy for decades. You could call it the “Dr Evil syndrome”.

This is the idea, popular in Hollywood, that killing or capturing a “bad guy” is the key to solving a complex foreign policy problem. It did not work out like that with Saddam. And it is unlikely that the Dr Evil theory will fare any better after the killing last week of Qassem Soleimani, Iran’s most feared military commander.

Many of the “bad guys” eliminated by the US over the years were genuinely evil. Those successfully targeted have included not just Saddam and Soleimani, but also Osama bin Laden, the head of al-Qaeda, and Muammer Gaddafi, the tyrannical leader of Libya.

您已阅读18%(945字),剩余82%(4315字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

吉迪恩•拉赫曼

吉迪恩•拉赫曼(Gideon Rachman)在英国《金融时报》主要负责撰写关于美国对外政策、欧盟事务、能源问题、manbetx20客户端下载 manbetx app苹果 化等方面的报道。他经常参与会议、学术和商业活动,并作为评论人活跃于电视及广播节目中。他曾担任《manbetx20客户端下载 学人》亚洲版主编。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×