manbetx3.0 银行业

Lex_Chinese banks

Chinese banks are cheap. This is a truth universally acknowledged. But it is also well known that there are good reasons for them to command a low multiple. China’s economy is slowing down; the property and credit cycles are both reaching the point where a true bust looks possible; corporate governance is horrible and involves placing blind faith in China’s Communist party.

But there is a case that Chinese financials offer the margin of safety required by value investors. Take Bank of China. It has kept churning out a return on equity of 18 per cent through the economic slowdown of the last three years, is adequately capitalised and trades at 0.87 times book value (and 5.2 times trailing earnings). It is manifestly too big to fail, so some government aid would arrive if worst comes to worst.

Does this add up to the necessary margin of safety? Possibly not. The realistic worst-case scenario is highly plausible, and seriously damaging. But it is possible to create a margin of safety by hedging. And China’s importance in the world economy means that the worst-case scenario for Bank of China is easy to hedge.

您已阅读60%(1120字),剩余40%(757字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×