观点哥本哈根协议

WE SHOULD CHANGE TACK ON CLIMATE AFTER COPENHAGEN
后哥本哈根:我们必须另谋出路


哥本哈根共识中心主任隆伯格:哥本哈根峰会的失败,或许会使我们警醒:现阶段我们必须致力于降低绿色能源的成本,而不是削减碳排放。

After 12 days of protests, posturing and seemingly endless palaver, the elephantine gathering that was the Copenhagen climate summit has laboured mightily and brought forth . . . a mouse. As vague as it is toothless, the accord on curbing greenhouse gas emissions that emerged from the Bella Centre this weekend imposes no real obligations, sets no binding emissions targets and requires no specific actions by anyone.

哥本哈根气候峰会历时12天,期间抗议不断,与会者做尽姿态、说尽空话。为举办这次大象级的会议,人们大费周章,取得的成果却小如老鼠。相关方面在贝拉中心(Bella Centre)签署的抑制温室气体排放协议含糊其辞、软弱无力,既未规定切实责任、设定具有约束力的排放目标,也未要求任何一方采取具体行动。

您已阅读6%(565字),剩余94%(8301字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×