专栏印度大选

India votes for pragmatism- if anything

In

Amit Mitra, a prominent Indian business leader, put it best. “We were very worried that we were going to get a kedgeree,” he said, expressing widespread concern that India's election would produce an inchoate mishmash of politicians and ideologies. Instead, the country's regionally and caste-divided electorate has somehow combined to cook up an altogether better-planned menu – a Congress-led thali.

Having spent the past five weeks telling us that the result would be determined by local or factional issues, commentators are scrambling to impose a national narrative on the individual votes of 420m Indians. The electorate, we are now told, has collectively opted for modernism, stability, growth and governance. Thank goodness that votes for backwardness, instability, stagnation and corruption were unsuccessful.

您已阅读16%(819字),剩余84%(4445字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。

戴维•皮林

戴维•皮林(David Pilling)现为《金融时报》非洲事务主编。此前他是FT亚洲版主编。他的专栏涉及到商业、投资、政治和manbetx20客户端下载 方面的话题。皮林1990年加入FT。他曾经在伦敦、智利、阿根廷工作过。在成为亚洲版主编之前,他担任FT东京分社社长。

相关文章

相关话题

设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×