FT商学院

The missing middle in the defence of global trade

Talk of replacing the US as anchor of the multilateral system has come to little

A year ago this week, Donald Trump, with an aggressive rhetorical flourish, announced a range of tariffs against trading partners across the world. His “liberation day” levies attracted deserved derision. They were based on an unfounded state-of-emergency legal premise, and a dubious mathematical formula that ended up imposing tariffs on, among others, an archipelago of sub-Antarctic islands inhabited only by penguins.

The liberation day tariffs have failed so far on all fronts: practical, economic, political and legal. Trump was forced to reverse them a week later after a toxic reaction in financial markets, returning four months afterwards to impose a less drastic set of duties. They have shown no signs yet of achieving their various contradictory aims, including closing the overall trade deficit and bringing manufacturing jobs back to the US.

They are also deeply unpopular with the US public — Pew Research found six in 10 disapproved of Trump’s increased tariffs — and business. To top it all, the Supreme Court declared them unconstitutional last month, forcing Trump to rush to replace them with only slightly less arbitrary tariffs based on the balance of payments, unfair trade and national security. 

您已阅读32%(1220字),剩余68%(2556字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×