观点航空业

Oil prices reignite great airline debate: to hedge or not?

There is a case for bosses to accept that market forces, like bad weather, just have to be navigated as they arise

One thing all airlines have in common, for now at least, is their reliance on oil. But how they pay for it varies widely. There’s a divide between those that hedge — notably European and Asian airlines — and those that don’t. Going au naturel seems riskier now, but there is much to recommend it.

There’s a lot to be said for making a business’s most volatile input more predictable. Fuel roughly accounts for between a quarter and a third of an airline’s costs. Hedges gained widespread popularity as a form of insurance after the early 1990s Gulf War sent oil prices soaring. 

The big US carriers have mostly abandoned the practice after oil markets weakened, leaving them overpaying and red-faced. Scott Kirby, once American Airlines’ president and now boss of United, grumbled that bankers, not airlines, are the beneficiaries. Southwest gave up last year. Delta, for its part, owns a refinery.

您已阅读30%(896字),剩余70%(2086字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×