FT商学院

AI garden planners are like spades — powerless unless masterfully steered

Digital garden planning programmes can be useful tools, but they can’t replace human imagination, experience — and the instinct to go rogue
A hot colour border at Munstead Wood, Surrey; Gertrude Jekyll’s hand-drawn plan for the garden

While I wait for Mother Nature’s next cruelty to gardens, I am busy planning new plantings. They vary with gardens’ categories: new ones, small ones, big ones in need of revitalisation and big ones that are gloriously empty and need planting throughout. Planning of plantings can be micro or macro. It can be obsessive, down to the last mini-primrose, or relaxed, about which plants in a big batch will eventually go where. It is fascinating to see which type of planner new garden owners begin by being and which they become with experience.

I leave myself latitude when a plant plan has to become planting in reality, but it is a latitude framed by a broader plan of what I need where. Should the planting plan simply be done digitally, especially with use of AI? In my case no, because I am not digitally deft and at this time of year I am screen-shocked after coping with online tax returns, compiled with VAT systems whose add-ins do not function and whose compatible hubs to HM Revenue & Customs then fail on New Year’s Eve.

您已阅读15%(1124字),剩余85%(6161字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×