FT商学院

New challenges put the Bretton Woods institutions at a crossroads

With the world in fresh crisis, bold action is again needed from the IMF and World Bank
The writer is a former senior UN and World Bank official and a member of the external advisory panel to the Bretton Woods institutions, together with Patrick Achi, former prime minister of Côte d’Ivoire, and Sri Mulyani Indrawati, outgoing finance minister of Indonesia

Just over 80 years ago, delegates from 44 nations met in bucolic Bretton Woods in New Hampshire. Freed from big city distractions, they agreed over three exhausting weeks the treaties that were to establish two world-changing institutions, the IMF and World Bank. 

Kristalina Georgieva and Ajay Banga, the current heads of the two bodies, took a small group of us back there last week to begin a discussion on where next for the Bretton Woods institutions. For a world again in crisis, what can they do to help it recover? Unlike that first conference, whose isolation helped limit developing country and civil society participation, this retreat was meant to begin a wider global debate. The more voices the better.

Expectations are low for multilateralism today in a fragmented world. But many delegates had dodged German U-boats to get to the 1944 conference. The world was far from at peace. Still, the legend was established: statesmanship prevailed and politics seemed suspended. But is that true? In fact, they were consumed by geopolitical rifts that were not dissimilar from those of today.

您已阅读28%(1367字),剩余72%(3451字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×