观点美联储

The next Fed chair shouldn’t party like it’s 1999

It is premature to assume the AI era will lead to non-inflationary growth like the ’90s computing boom

As 2026 begins, the most optimistic observers of the US economy are those seeking to become the next Federal Reserve chair. All see the technological gains stemming from artificial intelligence propelling the US towards rapid growth and higher living standards without inflation. For them, the late 2020s are a rerun of the 1990s.

Whether it is Kevin Hassett seeing “a productivity boom”, Kevin Warsh writing that AI will be a “significant disinflationary force” or Scott Bessent expecting “a 1990s scenario . . . [with] lower interest rates, higher growth and higher productivity”, all three think the new Fed chair can emulate Alan Greenspan. Justifying low interest rates, of course, is also a prerequisite to getting the job, since President Donald Trump has demanded lower rates.

It is important not to dismiss the productivity boom thesis entirely. Jay Powell, the incumbent, has also highlighted productivity improvements as the rationale for the Fed boosting its growth forecasts for 2026 by half a percentage point to 2.3 per cent in December. Powell said that US productivity growth had been “structurally higher for several years”. It is now improving output per hour far faster than most other advanced economies, where it has stagnated since the pandemic.

您已阅读33%(1266字),剩余67%(2578字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×