观点美英关系

Forget the ‘special relationship’ — Britain needs to be more transactional

Pieties about the bond between London and Washington won’t help the UK navigate an uncertain world

The writer was UK ambassador to the US, 2012-16

For more than 80 years the relationship between Britain and the United States has been endlessly described as special. The term has served us both pretty well. Washington would call on the “special relationship” when requiring a particular favour of the British government, as in Afghanistan after 9/11 or in Iraq in 2003; the UK cites it when describing our close defence and intelligence links, US support for our nuclear deterrent, the closeness of our commercial relations, and our common language. Or when feeling unloved by closer neighbours.

But it hasn’t been faultless. Harold Wilson memorably declined to send British troops to Vietnam. In the sterling crises of 1967 and 1976, Washington declined to support the pound. In the Falklands war of 1982 the US would not support the right of the inhabitants to self-determination. In 1994, Bill Clinton infuriated the government of John Major by granting visas to Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness before the IRA had renounced the use of violence.

您已阅读22%(1048字),剩余78%(3720字)包含更多重要信息,订阅以继续探索完整内容,并享受更多专属服务。
版权声明:本文版权归manbetx20客户端下载 所有,未经允许任何单位或个人不得转载,复制或以任何其他方式使用本文全部或部分,侵权必究。
设置字号×
最小
较小
默认
较大
最大
分享×